Improving Risk Management in DC and Hybrid Pension Plans

François Cocquemas: This short paper highlights the key conclusions of Amenc et al. (2012) regarding the best practices for managing risks in defined-contribution (DC) and hybrid plans.

Author(s):

Francois Cocquemas

PhD in Finance candidate and research assistant at EDHEC-Risk Institute.

Pension funds can be described, according to Sender (2012), based on their degree of hybridity between the pure definedcontribution (DC) and pure defined-benefit (DB) systems. In a DC scheme, each member owns a certain number of units in a fund; for a given member, the market value of his or her pension is the number of units times the net asset value per unit. At retirement, members can usually claim their pension rights as a lump sum, purchase an annuity (at a cost), or a mix of the two. Similarly, hybrid plans have a DC component with a given proportion of risk sharing (see Figure 1), which essentially makes them function very closely to pure DC funds. In current schemes, the member can choose between several funds. Most of these funds, in their current forms, are plagued with issues: inadequate strategies (lack of diversification, rare or antiquated life-cycle approaches); little to no risk management; high costs; limited or costly options for pay-out; lack of transparency and vulnerability to non-financial risks. Here, we focus on the investment strategies and the closely linked risk management decisions they entail. Most current DC funds and the DC part of hybrid plans share the same need for better asset-liability management (ALM) strategies, which rely on simple principles and an extensively- tested literature. Proper ALM strategies require three components: liability-driven investing (LDI), to account for consumption objectives at retirement; life-cycle investing (LCI), to account for the time to retirement; and risk-controlled investing (RCI), to account for short-term risk budgets. Beyond investment risk, though, the risks in pension plans can only be thoroughly managed through a generalised move towards hybrid plans and an integrated approach to risk management, that respect both the institutional and financial specificities of pensions, and especially the role of the sponsor company when there is one.

Type: EDHEC Publication
Date: le 27/11/2012
Research Cluster : Finance

See Also

AGORA MEETS BERTRAND BADIE, POLITICAL SCIENTIST AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SPECIALIST
News
- 21-10-2021
Agora students held another 'Rencontre de l'Agora' event on Wednesday 19 October, this...
Eiffel Excellence Scholarship: the most prestigious French scholarship you can get
News
- 21-10-2021
Mikhail Miroshnichenko joined EDHEC MiM Finance after his Bachelor’s degree in...
EDHEC-Auchan Learning Partnership: Retail industry transformations at the heart of EDHEC International BBA learning
News
- 20-10-2021
Auchan is joining forces with EDHEC to share its retail industry expertise with EDHEC...
The FIR-PRI Awards “Finance & Sustainability” prize for “best pedagogical innovation”: preparing future generations to fight climate change.
News
- 18-10-2021
At EDHEC, we want to take part in the fight against climate change. Through our...