Lixia Loh, Stoyan Stoyanov: Value-at-risk (VaR) and conditional valueat-risk (CVaR) have become standard choices for risk measures in finance.
Senior research engineer at EDHEC Risk Institute–Asia.
Professor of finance at EDHEC Business School and head of research at EDHEC Risk Institute-Asia.
Both VaR and CVaR are examples of measures of tail risk, or downside risk, because they are designed to exhibit a degree of sensitivity to large portfolio losses whose frequency of occurrence is described by what is known as the tail of the distribution: a part of the loss distribution away from the central region geometrically resembling a tail. In practice, VaR provides a loss threshold exceeded with some small predefined probability, usually 1% or 5%, while CVaR measures the average loss higher than VaR and is, therefore, more informative about extreme losses. An interesting practical question is to compare tail risk as measured by VaR and/or CVaR across different markets. There are at least two reasons for that. First, understanding the sources of tail risk is the first step towards designing methods for its management and, second, understanding differences across markets is important for risk management for international portfolios.
|Research Cluster :||Finance|