Doctoral thesis

Bankruptcy Law Reforms and Enforcement: consequences on Bank Credit for SMEs

“Great Expectations” or “Side Effects”? Bankruptcy Law Reforms and Bank Credit for SMEs: A series of Italian Bankruptcy Law reforms, aiming to facilitate debt renegotiation ...

Auteur(s) :

Marco Ghitti, PhD

Adjunct Lecturer at EDHEC Business School, Teaching Fellow at Bocconi, Equity Partner & Head of Corporate Finance at Studio Ghitti e Associati (Italy)

Abstract :

“Great Expectations” or “Side Effects”? Bankruptcy Law Reforms and Bank Credit for SMEs: A series of Italian Bankruptcy Law reforms, aiming to facilitate debt renegotiation and business continuation, allows us to disentangle how a change of creditor rights affects Bank Credit Market for SMEs. We exploit a new credit level dataset on bank credit, with more than 6.4 million pooled observations. By constructing a new Creditor Rights Index across all bankruptcy proceedings available for SMEs, we find that reforms weakening creditor rights increase interest rates and reduce amount of credit available, causing credit rationing. Consequences of reforms are not equally distributed, but are stronger for riskier firms and unsecured credits. Results highlight that regulators’ decisions may have unintended consequences.

When Courts meet the Law: Consequences of Bankruptcy Law Enforcement on Bank Credit for SMEs: Enforcement risk is a key friction in financial markets. We document this point with reference to the Bank Credit Market for SMEs. We exploit variation in the duration of bankruptcy proceedings across courts in Italy, together with a series of Bankruptcy Law reforms, to shed light on the impacts of enforcement quality on firms’ financing conditions. Taking advantage of a new credit level dataset on bank credit, with 6.4 million pooled observation, we find that court (in)efficiency amplifies the effects of the reforms. When creditor rights shrink, SMEs operating in less efficient judicial districts experience a larger contraction of credit volumes, causing credit rationing, as well as a stronger rise of bank lending rates. Effects are not equally distributed, but are stronger for riskier, unsecured and new credits. Findings show that even reforms originally aimed to facilitate access to credit may have opposite consequences, which enforcement quality exacerbates.

Date : 24/06/2016
Thesis Committee :

Supervisor: Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, EDHEC Business School

External reviewer: Erasmo Giambona, University of Amsterdam

Other committee member: Abraham Lioui, EDHEC Business School

See Also

Special Issue on PhD Research
Actualités
- 24-06-2020
EDHEC PhD in Finance Newsletter - Special Issue - June 2020 Article signed by Professor...
Still Too Big to Fail?
Actualités
- 24-06-2020
EDHEC PhD in Finance Newsletter - June 2020  Editorial © signed by Darrell Duffie[1] ,...
L’EDHEC rejoint la Global Research Alliance for Sustainable Finance and Investment
Actualités
- 09-06-2020
L’EDHEC Business School intègre la Global Research Alliance for Sustainable Finance and...
The EDHEC Community mourns the passing of a PhD alumnus
Actualités
- 20-04-2020
It is with great sadness that we share the news of the passing of one of our EDHEC...