How Costly Is Regulatory Short-Termism for Defined-Benefit Pension Funds?

The recent pension crisis has triggered a fierce debate in most developed countries between advocates of tighter regulation designed to provide explicit incentives for pension funds to increase their focus on risk management and those arguing that imposing short-term funding constraints and solvency requirements on such long-term investors would only increase the cost of pension financing.

Auteur(s) :

Lionel Martellini

Professor of Finance and Scientific Director of the EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre.

Vincent Milhau

Research Engineer, EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre

Présentation :

We analyse this question in the context of a formal continuous-time dynamic asset allocation model for an investor facing liability commitments subject to inflation and interest rate risks. In an empirical exercise, we find that the presence of short-term funding ratio constraints indeed involves a positive welfare cost, but that cost is not found to be prohibitive for reasonable parameter values. Recognizing that the presence of minimum funding ratio constraints, whether desirable or not, should affect the optimal allocation policy, we then provide the formal solution to the asset allocation problem in the presence of such constraints. We compare these risk-controlled strategies to unconstrained allocation strategies coupled with additional contributions, and find that the latter involve severe welfare costs in the presence of irreversible contributions and regulatory shorttermism, especially when marginal utility decreases sharply beyond a given threshold. In essence, we show that risk-management strategies can turn irreversible contributions and short-term constraints into reversible contributions and long-term constraints. Overall, our results suggest that it is not so much the presence of short-term funding ratio constraints that is costly for pension funds as their reluctance to implement risk-management strategies that are optimal given such regulatory constraints.
How Costly Is Regulatory Short-Termism for Defined-Benefit Pension Funds?...
(4.21 MB)
Type : Position paper
Date : le 06/10/2008
Complément d'informations For more information, please contact Séverine Anjubault, EDHEC Research and Development Department [ ] The contents of this paper do not necessarily reflect the opinions of EDHEC Business School.
Pôle de recherche Finance

A voir également

- 17-01-2017
[Téléchargez le Programme]   S'inscrire         L'EDHEC Research Day se tiendra le mardi 14 mars 2017 sur le campus EDHEC Business School de Lille. Les...
L’EDHEC 3eme Grande Ecole Française selon le classement du Financial Times (2016-2017)
- 05-12-2016
L’EDHEC Business School intègre le cercle très fermé et exigeant du Top 15 des «...
- 29-11-2016
Dans sa nouvelle publication, Multi-Dimensional Risk and Performance Analysis for Equity Portfolios, EDHEC-Risk Institute envisage une approche originale face aux pratiques d'...
Tous unis contre le handicap
- 24-11-2016
Au cours de cette journée, des entreprises et des associations ont présenté leurs...