Bad procurement creates systematic risk for investors, says latest research from EDHEC Infrastructure Institute

A case study of 10 Spanish toll road projects shows that ill-designed procurement can lead to pro-cyclical infrastructure investment risk and significant losses for private investors.

EDHEC Infrastructure Institute – an academic research organisation building performance benchmarks for investors in private infrastructure – shed new light on the risks encountered in infrastructure project investment with new research examining the failed Spanish toll roads that the government just took over and intends to retender to private investors later this year.

The paper - Tome La Siguiente Salida (Take the Next Exit) - A Case Study of Road Investments Gone Wrong, Spain, 1998 - 2018 - is based on detailed financial data on each of the concession companies as well as in - depth interviews with individuals representing the public and private sector directly involved in the  collapsed projects.

Despite the discipline of project financing and the presence of a blanket government guarantee in case of bankruptcy, equity investors were wiped out and their lenders booked losses of 90 cents on the dollar. How and why did these projects fail? The detailed analysis of the events that led to the bankruptcy of all but one of  the nine toll road concessions shows how case studies can be a valuable tool for understanding risk for investors.

Governments can procure privately financed infrastructure projects in ways that magnify moral hazard and create system at ic risk for investors. In the case of the Spanish toll roads the simultaneous procurement of multiple large projects in a single national market, and extremely aggressive financial structuring meant the
projects could not withstand the twin shocks of rising land expropriation costs and falling traffic volumes.

But nor should the Government have covered lenders’ losses despite the guarantee that covered events of bankruptcy. The authors use a series of models based on Game Theory (the theory of strategic bargaining) to show there was no incentive for the private sector to restructure the failing concessions and it becomes  rational for the public sector to let the projects fail. There were no bad guys, just rational actors.

Silvia Garcia, a co-author of the study, and Senior Analyst at EDHECinfra, says: “Game theory can provide investors with a powerful set of tools to model and predict what is often labelled as ‘political risk’, and also holds lessons for the design of guarantees and the dynamics they create at the procurement stage.”

Co-author and EDHECinfra director Frederic Blanc-Brude says: “Asset owners and managers are typically limited to making private infrastructure investments one deal at a time. Building a well-diversified portfolio, when it is possible, can take a decade. Thus, individual infrastructure investment case studies can usefully complement quantitative studies and improve investors’ knowledge and understanding of risk, including the nature and effect of political and regulatory shocks.”

Download the full research paper here

Authors:
Silvia Garcia Moraleja, Senior Analyst, EDHEC Infrastructure Institute
Tim Whittaker, Associate Research Director, EDHEC Infrastructure Institute
Frederic Blanc-Brude, Director, EDHEC Infrastructure Institute

Find out more about EDHECinfra

EDHECinfra index and analytics data is available through an online platform at indices.edhecinfra.com or through Bloomberg (EIPEE, EIPDE).