Factor strategies should be based on scientific consensus

"(...) Investors should take note of the debate taking place within the factor investing industry. On one side, are those who support a purist approach to the definition of factors, arguing th ...

Cited As:

Noël Amenc

CEO - ERI Scientific Beta

"(...) Investors should take note of the debate taking place within the factor investing industry. On one side, are those who support a purist approach to the definition of factors, arguing that factor strategies should be built using factor proxies that undergo rigorous scientific tests. Scientific Beta, the organisation linked to EDHEC Business School, is a vocal supporter of this approach. (...) However, Scientific Beta has shown that providers have a tendency to review their factor proxies after relatively short periods of time. Rigour, in Scientific Beta’s view, would require proxies to be consistent over time. Scientific Beta’s CEO, Nöel Amenc, says that this is a false dichotomy (see Strategically Speaking, page 72). He argues that scientific consensus shows that only a limited number of straightforward proxies pass the robustness test. However, strategies based on more complex factor definitions continue to attract assets. (...)"

Type: Press article
Date: le 02/12/2019
Research Cluster : Finance
Source : IPE

See Also

The value of experience
News
- 13-02-2020
Between the wave of regulatory reforms that followed the financial crisis of 2008, the...
EDHEC-Risk is collaborating with Bank of America to develop new research on goal-based investing
News
- 11-02-2020
New research chair on goal-based wealth management and application to retirement...
What To Do If You Don’t Get Accepted — Next Steps to Success
News
- 07-02-2020
After putting hard work and effort into a business school or university application, we...
Meet the Sustainability-Focussed Club Making an Impact
News
- 05-02-2020
Last year a group of Global MBA students were inspired and united with a common goal:...