Written on 02 March 2015.
If this provision is adopted, EDHEC-Risk Institute considers that it would constitute a step backwards compared to the texts currently in place, which organise the transparency of the investment industry.
With the development of passive investment, notably in the pension fund world, EDHEC-Risk Institute does not understand why the commission wishes to promote a text that falls far short of ESMA’s transparency requirements for financial indices used in UCITS. EDHEC-Risk Institute would have thought that, in a concern for better investor protection, the parliament would have strengthened transparency requirements rather than weakening them and ultimately limiting them to UCITS funds alone, which only represent a portion of European savings.
EDHEC-Risk Institute calls on the committee to refuse the removal of the planned provisions on transparency in the proposal for a regulation on indices used as benchmarks and indeed, on the contrary, to introduce high standards of transparency that will address the legitimate information needs of index users and leverage market discipline to efficiently reduce the risks of abuse and promote competition and innovation in the indexing industry.
The draft regulation on which it is proposed that the committee will vote can only strengthen the false sense of security conferred by a law that is supposed to be protective but in fact is not protective at all because it institutionalises opacity. This opacity will have non-negligible consequences on the increase in risk in passive investment and is in total contradiction with the desire to strengthen the quality and security of financial products offered to the public that the European Parliament has affirmed on many occasions.
A copy of the open letter addressed to the Chair of the European Parliament ECON committee, Roberto Gualtieri on February 20, 2015 can be found here.