Are Hedge-Fund UCITS the Cure-All?

As part of the CACEIS research chair on non-financial risks in investment funds, EDHEC surveyed UCITS and alternative asset managers, their service providers, external observers, and investors for their views of structuring hedge fund strategies as UCITS.

Author(s) :

Noel Amenc

Professor of finance and director of EDHEC Risk Institute.

Samuel Sender

Applied research manager at EDHEC Risk Institute.

Presentation :

The 437 respondents report assets under management (AUM) of more than €13 trillion. Investment fund managers account for roughly €7 trillion of these assets. In general, the survey suggests that institutional investors bound by quantitative restrictions will ask fund managers and distributors to repackage hedge fund strategies as UCITS. For their part, managers of alternative funds are concerned by the uncertainties surrounding the directive on alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) and may consider packaging their strategies as UCITS. Most respondents, however, fear that structuring hedge fund strategies as UCITS will distort strategies and diminish returns. Many strategies, after all, would need to be altered to earn the UCITS label, and liquidity requirements would put the liquidity risk premium out of reach. In addition, hedge-fund UCITS pose operational problems that, as our survey suggests, the industry is insufficiently aware of. In sum, the use of UCITS to distribute hedge funds is the perverse outcome of a messy set of regulations; so EDHEC suggests improved regulation of investment funds and properly designed incentives: incentives to invest in illiquid assets could be designed in regulated closed funds with a fixed horizon; incentives to adopt the AIFM directive must be given by modifying the regulation of European institutional investors and authorising them to invest directly in funds that comply with the AIFM directive; incentives to manage rather than to insure non-financial risks must be given by defining the responsibilities of distributors, asset managers, depositaries, and valuators and requiring them to hold the adequate regulatory capital.
Pdf
Are Hedge-Fund UCITS the Cure-All?...
(3.23 MB)
Type : Publication EDHEC
Date : le 12/05/2010
Extra information : Pour plus d'informations, nous vous prions de vous adresser à Joanne Finlay, Direction de la recherche de l'EDHEC [ joanne.finlay@edhec.edu ] Les opinions exprimées sont celles des auteurs et n'engagent pas la responsabilité de l'EDHEC.
Research Cluster : Finance

See Also

FT 2016 European Business School Rankings: EDHEC joins the European Top 15
- 05-12-2016
EDHEC Business School joins the exclusive group of the Financial Times’ Top 15 European...
- 09-11-2016
EDHEC Business School introduces new certificates into its Financial Economics programmes, to help its students further differentiate themselves on the placement fronts. These non-degree...
EDHEC MBA moved up 10 positions to reach the Top25 in The Economist WhichMBA Ranking 2016
- 13-10-2016
EDHEC Business School is pleased to announce that the Economist has ranked EDHEC Global...
- 29-09-2016
There are four key findings: • A high global rate of satisfaction (86%) towards Smart Beta among ETF users Investors consider smart beta indices as tools for improving their investment...