The Elephant in the Room: Accounting and Sponsor Risks in Corporate Pension Plans

As part of the AXA research chair on regulation and institutional investment, EDHEC surveyed corporate pension funds, their sponsors, and advisers to assess how sponsors manage pension risk and how pension funds manage sponsor risk.

Author(s) :

Samuel Sender

Applied Research Manager at EDHEC-Risk Institute

Presentation :

There are 100 respondents to the survey; they manage pension funds assets of more than €730 billion (the assets of sponsoring companies are greater than €5.5 trillion). Sponsors that give their employees pension plans are subject to the risk of having to make additional contributions to make up for shortfalls in pension funds as well as to a more specific accounting risk that arises because of the arbitrary accounting assumptions that differ from those typical of financial economics. In a traditional defined-benefit (DB) pension plan, all of the financial and biometric risks in pension funds are borne by the sponsor (unless it goes bankrupt). Plan assets, however, are managed independently from the sponsor by pension trustees, and the separation of powers prevents trustees from managing these assets in the best interest of the sponsor, which can find it difficult to hedge pension risks in its own balance sheet. It is because of this separation of powers that many sponsors fail to manage pension risks at all; it also contributes to the termination of many traditional defined-benefit plans. Pension plans are subject to the risk of the guarantee from their sponsor disappearing when the sponsor goes bankrupt or is in distress. In most countries, this risk is covered only partly by pension insurance, but the levy charged by the pension insurance scheme would not be reduced if pension funds hedged this risk themselves, in which case the pension fund would in effect pay twice the cost of protection. Dutch regulation has relied solely on strong funding requirements to protect pension benefits, and only recently has it become clear that this regulation offered only partial protection. In most countries, the risk of either a bankrupt sponsor's leaving an underfunded pension plan or a financially weak sponsor's leading to pension curtailments means that pension funds should hedge the risk of deterioration of the health of the sponsor. Such a hedge, however, is seldom considered by respondents, most frequently because it would be seen as an aggressive move by the sponsor. We argue, however, that the sponsor can also benefit from such a hedge if its contributions are reduced when its health is weaker.
Pdf
The Elephant in the Room: Accounting and Sponsor Risks in Corporate Pension Plan...
(2.50 MB)
Type : Publication EDHEC
Date : le 21/06/2011
Extra information : For more information, please contact Joanne Finlay, EDHEC Research and Development Department [ joanne.finlay@edhec.edu ] The contents of this paper do not necessarily reflect the opinions of EDHEC Business School.
Research Cluster : Finance

See Also

- 06-04-2017
This week, to bring current and future challenges facing leaders directly to the classroom, the EDHEC Global MBA launches two 18-hour core courses devised and taught in collaboration with...
- 04-04-2017
The distinctive Multirank assessment ranks 1,500 prestigious schools and universities worldwide, including 74 French institutions.  EDHEC stands out in 2017 as the French business...
Frédéric Oudéa, Chief Executive Officer of Société Générale, meets EDHEC students
- 31-03-2017
Société Générale is one of the 3 banks in France’s CAC 40 stock index. The bank’s Chief...
- 30-03-2017
Close to 900 people attended the 9th edition of EDHEC Research Day held on Tuesday, 14 March 2017 on the EDHEC Lille Campus. We are very grateful for your interest and your role in the...