The Elephant in the Room: Accounting and Sponsor Risks in Corporate Pension Plans

As part of the AXA research chair on regulation and institutional investment, EDHEC surveyed corporate pension funds, their sponsors, and advisers to assess how sponsors manage pension risk and how pension funds manage sponsor risk.

Author(s):

Samuel Sender

Applied Research Manager at EDHEC-Risk Institute

There are 100 respondents to the survey; they manage pension funds assets of more than €730 billion (the assets of sponsoring companies are greater than €5.5 trillion). Sponsors that give their employees pension plans are subject to the risk of having to make additional contributions to make up for shortfalls in pension funds as well as to a more specific accounting risk that arises because of the arbitrary accounting assumptions that differ from those typical of financial economics. In a traditional defined-benefit (DB) pension plan, all of the financial and biometric risks in pension funds are borne by the sponsor (unless it goes bankrupt). Plan assets, however, are managed independently from the sponsor by pension trustees, and the separation of powers prevents trustees from managing these assets in the best interest of the sponsor, which can find it difficult to hedge pension risks in its own balance sheet. It is because of this separation of powers that many sponsors fail to manage pension risks at all; it also contributes to the termination of many traditional defined-benefit plans. Pension plans are subject to the risk of the guarantee from their sponsor disappearing when the sponsor goes bankrupt or is in distress. In most countries, this risk is covered only partly by pension insurance, but the levy charged by the pension insurance scheme would not be reduced if pension funds hedged this risk themselves, in which case the pension fund would in effect pay twice the cost of protection. Dutch regulation has relied solely on strong funding requirements to protect pension benefits, and only recently has it become clear that this regulation offered only partial protection. In most countries, the risk of either a bankrupt sponsor's leaving an underfunded pension plan or a financially weak sponsor's leading to pension curtailments means that pension funds should hedge the risk of deterioration of the health of the sponsor. Such a hedge, however, is seldom considered by respondents, most frequently because it would be seen as an aggressive move by the sponsor. We argue, however, that the sponsor can also benefit from such a hedge if its contributions are reduced when its health is weaker.

Type: EDHEC Publication
Date: le 21/06/2011
Research Cluster : Finance

See Also

AGORA MEETS BERTRAND BADIE, POLITICAL SCIENTIST AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SPECIALIST
News
- 21-10-2021
Agora students held another 'Rencontre de l'Agora' event on Wednesday 19 October, this...
Eiffel Excellence Scholarship: the most prestigious French scholarship you can get
News
- 21-10-2021
Mikhail Miroshnichenko joined EDHEC MiM Finance after his Bachelor’s degree in...
EDHEC-Auchan Learning Partnership: Retail industry transformations at the heart of EDHEC International BBA learning
News
- 20-10-2021
Auchan is joining forces with EDHEC to share its retail industry expertise with EDHEC...
The FIR-PRI Awards “Finance & Sustainability” prize for “best pedagogical innovation”: preparing future generations to fight climate change.
News
- 18-10-2021
At EDHEC, we want to take part in the fight against climate change. Through our...