Keynes Meets Markowitz: The Trade-off Between Familiarity and Diversification

We develop a model of portfolio choice that nests the views of Keynes—who advocates concentration in a few familiar assets—and Markowitz—who advocates diversication across assets.

Author(s):

Phelim Boyle

Lorenzo Garlappi

University of British Columbia

Raman Uppal

Edhec Business School

Tan Wang

University of British Columbia

We rely on the concepts of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion to formalize the idea of an investor's "familiarity" toward assets. The model shows that when an investor is equally ambiguous about all assets, then the optimal portfolio corresponds to Markowitz's fully-diversied portfolio. In contrast, when an investor exhibits different degrees of familiarity across assets, the optimal portfolio depends on (i) the relative degree of ambiguity across assets, and (ii) the standard deviation of the estimate of expected return on each asset. If the standard deviation of the expected return estimate and the difference between the ambiguity about familiar and unfamiliar assets are low, then the optimal portfolio is composed of a mix of both familiar and unfamiliar assets; moreover, an increase in correlation between assets causes an investor to increase concentration in the assets with which they are familiar (flight to familiarity). Alternatively, if the standard deviation of the expected return estimate and the difference in the ambiguity of familiar and unfamiliar assets are high, then the optimal portfolio contains only the familiar asset(s) as Keynes would have advocated. In the extreme case in which the ambiguity about all assets and the standard deviation of the estimated mean are high, then no risky asset is held (non-participation). The model also has empirically testable implications for comparative statics with respect to idiosyncratic and systematic risk: in response to a change in idiosyncratic risk, the Keynesian portfolio always exhibits a bigger change than the Markowitz portfolio, while the opposite is true for a change in systematic risk.

Type: Working paper
Date: le 03/01/2011
Research Cluster : Finance

See Also

EDHEC International BBA' sustainable forum
News
- 29-06-2022
On april, 7th our first sustainable forum was organised on both Nice and Lille campus....
EDHEC Augmented Law Institute and Sopra Steria sign a partnership to develop an agility index for legal departments
News
- 27-06-2022
Over the next 3 months, Sopra Steria's legal teams, who benefit from an advanced...
EDHEC ANNOUNCES THE CREATION OF A CENTRE FOR RESPONSIBLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP
News
- 27-06-2022
EDHEC Business School announced the creation of its Centre for Responsible...
The Economist ranks EDHEC Global MBA among Top 20 worldwide, #4 in Europe
News
- 22-06-2022
The EDHEC Global MBA ranks among the Top 20 best MBAs worldwide and #4 in Europe,...