Keynes Meets Markowitz: The Trade-off Between Familiarity and Diversification

We develop a model of portfolio choice that nests the views of Keynes—who advocates concentration in a few familiar assets—and Markowitz—who advocates diversication across assets.

Author(s):

Phelim Boyle

Lorenzo Garlappi

University of British Columbia

Raman Uppal

Edhec Business School

Tan Wang

University of British Columbia

We rely on the concepts of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion to formalize the idea of an investor's "familiarity" toward assets. The model shows that when an investor is equally ambiguous about all assets, then the optimal portfolio corresponds to Markowitz's fully-diversied portfolio. In contrast, when an investor exhibits different degrees of familiarity across assets, the optimal portfolio depends on (i) the relative degree of ambiguity across assets, and (ii) the standard deviation of the estimate of expected return on each asset. If the standard deviation of the expected return estimate and the difference between the ambiguity about familiar and unfamiliar assets are low, then the optimal portfolio is composed of a mix of both familiar and unfamiliar assets; moreover, an increase in correlation between assets causes an investor to increase concentration in the assets with which they are familiar (flight to familiarity). Alternatively, if the standard deviation of the expected return estimate and the difference in the ambiguity of familiar and unfamiliar assets are high, then the optimal portfolio contains only the familiar asset(s) as Keynes would have advocated. In the extreme case in which the ambiguity about all assets and the standard deviation of the estimated mean are high, then no risky asset is held (non-participation). The model also has empirically testable implications for comparative statics with respect to idiosyncratic and systematic risk: in response to a change in idiosyncratic risk, the Keynesian portfolio always exhibits a bigger change than the Markowitz portfolio, while the opposite is true for a change in systematic risk.

Type: Working paper
Date: le 03/01/2011
Research Cluster : Finance

See Also

How to make LEGACY A PATH TO THE FUTURE: A CONVERSATION WITH DELPHINE ARNAULT, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF LOUIS VUITTON
News
- 18-01-2022
We discussed with Delphine Arnault, Executive Vice President of Louis Vuitton and EDHEC...
The fight against climate change central to the EDHEC-Coursera specialisation
News
- 18-01-2022
EDHEC Business School launched the “Climate Change and Sustainable Investing”...
Meet an Alumnus: prepared for a managerial role
News
- 18-01-2022
Laurent Benichou joined VeryChic, AccorHotels group’s online travel agency as Area...
« The Future of Finance » : EDHEC affirms its financial-sector leadership with an inaugural series of forward-looking, academic-value-added lectures
News
- 17-01-2022
EDHEC Business School plans to host a series of monthly lectures entitled “The Future...